I wrote this Bruno review for my newspaper.
They synopsis: The first half of the movie is relatively pointless, and at times uncomfortably bad. But the second half, when he puts himself into ex-gay therapy—suddenly the movie has a point and it is HILARIOUS. And he makes a great statement.
Here we go:
Wassup, Bruno?
Film is raunchy, funny, and very gay
In September 2008, Sacha Baron Cohen popped up in the news: filming on
one of his famous comedy-documentaries, he had sneaked into a Milan
Fashion Week show and somehow worked his way onto the runway. With his
cameras rolling, he walked along the fashion models, wearing an
inexplicably-odd suit, pulling a massive prank that would make the cast
of MTV’s “Jackass” jealous. The runway lights were turned off, the
show was cancelled, the polizia were called—and Cohen's work was done,
whatever it was.
Of course, we now know he was filming his latest creation, "Bruno," a
somewhat-staged documentary about an Austrian fashion journalist who
sets out into the world to make himself famous. After the success of
his first film "Borat," a hilarious and shocking look at American
culture—it won Cohen the Golden Globe award for Best Actor—expectations
have been high for what Cohen has in store this time around.
The plot of “Bruno” is very thin: he wants to leave his life as a
journalist, so he heads to Los Angeles and attempts to reinvent himself
in various ways. He tries acting, he tries hosting a TV show, he
wanders around trying new things, failing miserably at each turn and
horrifying everyone along the way.
When none of those ideas work out, he realizes Hollywood will not
accept him if he is gay, so he travels to the Deep South for some
ex-gay therapy. And of course, hijinks ensue at every step of that
journey.
Thin plot or not—when "Bruno" is funny, it is uproarious. The fact
that Cohen puts himself into these situations, and then escapes with
his life, is a testament to his comedic genius. At one point, he
assembles leaders from the Palestinian Liberation Organization for
discussions on the difference between "hummus" and "Hamas"; what does
this have to do with the story? Nothing. But it is an amazing moment.
But “Bruno” is a mixed bag; there are times the film drags, where Cohen
seems to have lost some of his spontaneity. It is awkwardly obvious
many of the scenes are completely staged; I swear I saw one of the guys
from the “orgy scene” also in the audience at the “ultimate fighting
scene.” And many of the stunts are uncomfortable to watch: Bruno
somehow wrangles an interview with then-Presidential candidate Ron
Paul, but then corners him in a hotel room and drops his pants to show
off a hideous thong wrapped around his danger zone. Ron Paul is
horrified, of course, but anyone would be. It’s hard to understand the
point of the stunt—other than catching Paul calling Bruno a "queer" as
he fled the scene, but it's hard to blame the poor guy.
Cohen's over-the-top portrayal Bruno's "gayness" has come under fire as
being a negative stereotype, and the film had to be re-edited several
times to tone down the overt sexual lasciviousness, which offended
audiences both straight and gay alike. But the fact that Cohen toes
the line of offensiveness is the genius of the character. He is
proving a point: the mere existence of Bruno is threatening to people
around the globe, as he travels from country to country scaring the
locals just by being himself. (Although admittedly, stripping down to
a g-string and cornering Ron Paul in a hotel room did seem a little
threatening.) Cohen’s films are shocking not because of what he does,
but because he coerces people into letting their guard down and being
honest, which usually ends up with them saying something racist,
homophobic, or otherwise foolishly bigoted. It’s scary to watch his
films, and wonder what kinds of people are living out there in the
world.
The film climaxes at an ultimate fighting match, where Bruno tries the
most macho activity he can find to battle his gayness—but ends up
locking lips with another man in the ring. The crowd goes crazy,
throwing chairs and screaming threats as if they were watching
something ghastly. This stunt made the news when it happened as well;
although if two women did exactly the same thing, it would just be
considered porn.
As the audience at the fight screamed in horror, the audience in the
theater I was at also shouted in protest, saying what they were
watching was "disgusting" and "terrible." But they were too busy being
grossed out to understand they, too, were falling prey to Cohen’s
trick. Life imitates art.
This should not scare away gay moviegoers, however. At this point the film is so funny, listening
to a bunch of homophobic thugs get grossed out next to you really
doesn't matter. "Bruno" takes a while to get going, and Cohen misses
the mark a few times, but once he figures out what he is trying to say,
the movie is flat-out funny.